Thursday, 7 July 2016

Museum Artifact P2.3 (Bastet)

Artifact 9007-03

03. Seated figure of the goddess Bastet



Late period, 664- 302 BC
Egypt 
Bronze

This bronze cat probably represents the goddess Bastet, whose main temple was at Bubastis in north-eastern Egypt. It was probably bought by a pilgrim at the temple and dedicated to the goddess in hope of ensuring a long life and a good burial. Bastet could be a terrifying and powerful lioness goddess, or a benevolent and calm one, incarnated as an elegant cat.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Apologies for the unclear pictures, it was due to the lighting..

Anyways, the figure of Bastet is rather small and to me it looks like any ordinary sleek cat. I thought there would have been something really eye-catching for the goddess Bastet's figures.

Though it does look a tad bit different from any ordinary cat figure..probably because of the bronze that it was made out off.


To me Bastet has always been an interesting goddess in the Egyptian mythologies and so it was nice to see a figure of her.
After all, I've always been one to love cats too!!

As was mentioned, cats are a symbol of Bastet and she is also shown with the appearance of a cat.
This is why cats hold importance in Egypt. They are assosciated to gods and goddesses, especially that to Bastet. One may even be confused between Bastet and the goddess Sekhmet, which I have covered briefly in my previous post.


There are various other reasons to why cats were loved in Egypt which you could learn more at the click of the link below.
                        http://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk

For better information about the goddess Bastet, you could learn more with just a click below.....
                      http://egyptian-gods.org/egyptian-gods-bastet/
                      http://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk/bast.html



Monday, 23 May 2016

Museum Artifact P2.2 Amulets

Artifact 9007-01 & 02



01. Chest Ornament with heart-scarab


Around 1275 BC
Probably from Memphis, Egypt
Blue, Red, Green and Yellow glazed composition


Heart-scarabs were a type of amulet in the form of a dung beetle. The beetle was associated with the sun god and symbolised the renewal of life. This scarab is set within an ornate chest-ornament in the shape of a shrine. It shows the goddess Isis and her sister Nephthys worshipping the scarab.
~ British Museum

----------------------------------------------------

Seeing this described as an amulet was rather astonishing for me. Plainly, I thought all amulets were small and comes in types of jewelry, not big 'blocks'. Though I have to say it was an interesting piece of amulet. It isn't all decorative and yet it still stands out.

Apparently, the heart scarab were normally used as amulets, jewelry or even funeral goods. Though it is said to be used mostly for the dead where the heart scarab would be placed over the heart, and under the bandage itself.

But what confused me at first was why the sun god, Khepri, is being associated with these amulets which are mostly used for the dead.
Shouldn't the Sun be representing life and light etc?
Khepri

I did my little research and came to an understanding that the Egyptians believed that these scarab beetles held powers which ensures rebirth in the afterlife.
And the assosciation it holds with Khepri, the sun god? It was believed that the Sun dies each night and reborns each morning as a scarab beetle. This is how death and rebirth are heavily assosciated with the said Sun god.

Moving on, of you were to look closely at the detailings at either side of the blue beetle, you'd notice two females with their hands raised, with symbols at the sides. To be precise, they are important deities in the Egyptian mythology. Isis and Nephthys. 


Both are sisters and were described as twins due to their very similar appearance. Some view Isis as the light of both sisters, and Nephthys as the darker one. Probably due to their positions and roles in Egyptian Mythology. 
Isis and Nephthys

Together, they represents day and night; Life and death; Growth and decay. This must be why they are carved into the scarab.


02. Wedjat- eye Amulet


Around 664-525 BC
Egypt
Blue, Black and Yellow glazed composition

The wedjat-eye represents the eye of the falcon-god Horus, which was believed to have been injured and subsequently healed. It signified “wholeness” and gave magical protection to the owner. Wedjat amulets were worn in life but also included in burials.

~British Museum

----------------------------------------
Amulets as are known in the Egyptian mythology, holds an important role for the people. They are especially used for protection. Though it narrows down to which deity is used and represented on an amulet.

For this amulet, its the eye of Horus, one of the most used type of amulets in life and death.

For further information:
9007-01
Scarab Amulets
Khepri
nephthys
9007-02
Eye of Horus



Saturday, 21 May 2016

5,000 yrs old Woven Garment. Fashionable Indeed..


The world has labeled this very dress as the Oldest Woven Garment found up til today and this fashionable garment is at the age of 5,000 years old!

Originated from Egypt, this linen garment is considered to be rather fashionable. I mean..look at the knife pleated details at the top part of the dress, accompanied by a 'v' neckline! Its certainly what some of us would wear now!


Back to the pleatings, the horizontal way of pleating, seen around the shoulder leans more to the style of the Old Kingdom of Egypt.

But well, pleats has always been a huge factor in the Ancient Egypt fashion. Just look at all those relics and such..you'll recognize pleats everywhere.

This garment is known as the ' Tarkhan Dress' though the original length is unknown. To my guessing, I'd say that it would be a full length dress. After all, it is the most common for them Ancient Egyptian women to wear long dresses.

I have to say that it is very impressive as to how the garment was being constructed. Ancient Egyptians do try to have less sewing as possible in a garment and seeing that the pleats are still visible, though the garment is torn and damaged, it certainly is a wonder....

For more...
oldest garment ( about the 5000 yrs old)

Thursday, 5 May 2016

Museum Artifact P2.1- Sekhmet

Ancient Egypt

The civilisation of Ancient Egypt emerged around 5,000 years ago when a number of independent city-states united under the rule of one king. For much of the next 3,000 years, Egypt was the leading power in the Mediterranean. The annual flooding of the River Nile created fertile earth for farming, a key factor in the civilisation’s prosperity and endurance. The pharaoh (ruler) was both high priest and military leader, responsible for the well-being of the state and the Egyptian people.

At different times in its history, Egypt extended its empire over neighbouring areas and itself endured long periods of foreign domination. But Egypt was also linked to other countries through trade, and many foreigners were integrated into Egyptian society. Egyptian culture nonetheless remained distinctive and aspects of its architecture, art and religion spread across the ancient world.


(The British Museum)

Artifact code 9006



Seated statue of the goddess Sekhmet
18th Dynasty, around 1350 B.C.
Probably from Thebes, Egypt
Granodiorite

The Egyptian goddess, Sekhmet was associated with destruction. Her name means "she who is powerful", and she is represented as a lion-headed woman. It is thought that over 700 statues of the goddess were set up at the mortuary temple of the pharaoh  Amenthotep
III (ruled 1390- 1352 BC) in western Thebes. Many were later moved to the temple of Mut at Karnak, where this example have been found.
(The British Museum)
------------------------------------------------------------------ As I first came in, the statue strucked me as Regal and Majestic. Though it made me felt rather....afraid!

Extra information:

   Sekhmet is known for being one of the oldest Egyptian deities. She is the Solar deity, the Warrior goddess, the goddess of healing etc.

   She is represented as a lion-headed goddess since the female lioness is the true hunter, as observed by the Egyptians.
 Most of her statues shows her holding the ankh of life.
 At times, it is also with the addition of a sun disc on her head as she is represented by the intensifying head of the sun.

The picture below is her supposed full form.
Unfortunately, the statue I saw in the museum, had no sceptre or sun disc.

Sekhmet

Sekhmet was eapecially idolized by King 
Amenhotep III. He had about 730 statues of 
her in his mortuary temple located at the      west of Thebe.

King Amenhotep
(1390- 1352 BC)

King Amenhotep Mortuary Temple

Four statues dug out of the 
Mortuary Temple.
Seated and standing.


Links for more information:
Sekhmet
King Amenhotep III
Statues of Sekhmet found, Br Museum

Sunday, 1 May 2016

Museum Artifact Part I

A month ago, I visited the Treasures of the Museum which was where the British Museum loaned us few of its amazing artifacts. It was a brilliant showcase of artifacts from all around the world and from different time periods. Every artifact looks stunning in their own ways and i was amazed by the history behind them. So here I am sharing the pictures and historical facts about most of the artifacts I've seen.


Stone Handaxe
Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania/ Lower Palaeolithic
About 800,000 years old/ Quartzite

This handaxe is a masterpiece of the stone toolmaker's art. It is made from quartz with amethyst banding, a difficult material from which to fashion tools because of its extreme hardness.

First made in Africa, the use of handaxes spread to South Asia, the Middle East and Europe about 1 million years ago. They were used to skin animals and to work wood.

Saturday, 23 January 2016

Pandora

How did people kept up with trends in past centuries if there were no fashion magazines?
How did they manage to dress up in latest style throughout countries?



Well, that is where Pandora is the answer.
Pandoras was, during the 18th century, the only available update on fashion. They were fashion dolls, dressed in the latest of fashion, from the hairstyles down to the makeup, and passed throughout the European countries. Seemingly, they were more accurate than the words of mouth.

Pandoras came in various sizes and designs. Grande pandore were life-sized dolls, frequently dressed in Court attire, and Petit Pandore, miniature dolls, usually dressed in Informal attire.


These dolls were mostly made in France, which was the capital of Fashion, what not with Marie Antoinette as icon. Rose Bertin, Antoinette's seamstress was the one who brought back these wax dolls after they ceased in the 17th century. With the dolls making an appearance again, dressed with such outrageous dresses, they bacame popular. So popular til they were given safe passages throughout Europe, during Napoleon's blockade.


Pandoras were first gifted by Antoinette to her sisters and mother. From there, they were passed to the other Royalty and to the wealthier people, down to the seamstress who later passed it on to the poor New York who were always a trend behind.
Once advertisements and magazines came out, Pandoras were rarely used. They are nowadays either made as decorations or are placed in museums as historical pieces.
Old or new, I think they look stunning.

Saving Literature: Grimm Brothers


A bedtime story of Grimm's Fairytales was what I've always looked forward to as a child. These fairytales have played a huge role in my life as it does for others. Up til now, I've always prefered and admired these original tales to Disney's altered ones.

But then, I've always wondered if these tales were originally written by the Grimm Brothers themselves or not. With that in mind, I did my research and at last found out the very truth.

These fairytales were actually folk tales and stories passed down from generation to generation in Germany, through the words of mouth. Originally, the brothers, Wilhelm and Jacob, were worried that indistalization in the early 19th century would erase off these classic tales from existence. So, they decided to collect as much German tales as possible and bound them in a book. This way, the tales would be in literature as it is now. Additionally, the brothers felt that those tales were the foundations of Germany as after all, the stories were from way back and it was entertainment through these tales that united Germans on a daily basis.
Original edition

The stories that the Grimm brothers first collected and published were violent, tragic and sexual. Even though it was named "Children's and Household Tales", they were not at all meant for childrens.
As their book became popular, the more harsh criticism they faced. Parents found it too dark and churches thought it wasn't Christian enough.

And there comes the editing. Wipe off the sexual reference, change evil mothers to stepmothers, add a bible next to Red Riding Hood's grandmother and done. Off course there were more editing. As they edited, the brothers found themselves intensifying punishments for the villains and it was alright as they wanted to show what happens if you sin.
Later edited edition

Personally, I've read few tales from the original edition and find them to be rather interesting and fascinating. To me, the darker the better! I think that it is alright to include harsh terms in their tales as after all, life is harsh. And a way to get by is through tales that we might be able to relate to (in some ways). Furthermore, with the ideology of "Good always wins" emphasized in these tales, it would not only put us on our right track but also gives us hope.

The Grimm Brothers not only taught us morals that we hold on to, but they also preserved their culture, which is as equally important. History is always best through the form of literature.
With the brothers as role models, many writers, scholars and others has found themselves on the track to save their culture through folk tales. And this is incredible, for what is better than storytelling?

Creation of Rose Bertin

Queen of Fahion
Marie Antoinette

The dauphine, Marie Antoinette was the Queen of Fashion. But then who was the brain and talent behind Antoinette's fashionable closet? It is none other than the remarkable Rose Bertin. Born on 2nd July 1747 in Picardy, France, Marie-Jeanne Rose Bertin was the first even celebrated French fashion designer. Her explicit talent had named Marie Antoinette the most fashionable of queens and she was the one who brought Haute Couture to be a popular style up til today.


Minister of Fashion
Rose Bertin.

Earning the title of "Minister of Fashion", Marie Antoinette's marchandes de modes and a stylist, Rose Bertin is my muse in this post as her creativity continues to inspire me.
Bertin had influenced fashion greatly starting in the 18th century, through creating new trends as the Formal Court Dress, poufy hairdos and more. 


Pouf aux insurgent

Pouf hairstyles
With headdress

The most notable of her works was the pouf. These were high hairdos that were always heavily ornamented with ribbons, artificial flowers and others. For Marie Antoinette, Bertin constructed a 3 foot high pouf with jewels and all the finer things. Just imagine how heavy it'd be! Examples of poufs showcassed in events by the dauphine were the 'pouf aux insurgents' -which had a mini French naval vessel planted at the top-, 'pouf a la circonstance- for the change of reign-, and also the famous 'pouf a l' inoculation' which depicted a garden to celebrate the King's vaccination.


Marie Antoinette's gown
By Rose Bertin

Marie Antoinette's gown
By Rose Bertin

As fancy and outrageous those hairdos were, the gowns Bertin designed were incomparable! Even Lady Gaga might think twice in wearing them. The gowns were so huge and poufy til ladies could not even enter the door without having to squeeze through or enter sideways. As detailed and beautiful those gowns were, I would not want to wear one if I have to suffer! Especially with how heavy the gowns would be..
Pandore

Other than those fancy dresses and hairstyles, another notable creation of Bertin's was Pandores. They were dolls dressed in the latest trends, passed through countries as a fashion update. Afterall, there weren't fashion magazines back then!

Just how did Bertin came up with such creativity? It's rather hard to tell. But through meetings with Marie Antoinette, they worked on trends and styles that the Queen herself likes and what would appeal to the court. Once the dresses were designed and Bertin sold it in her shop, womens who coveted the Queen would purchase them and dress up like Antoinette in the Versailles. 


By Anton Hohenstein

Then, when the dauphine sees them like her, she would crave for bigger and fancier gowns. And just like that, it goes on.
 And I've been thinking, wouldn't Bertin finish up all her ideas? But then, I came across a quote of hers which she had remarked to the Queen, "There is nothing new except what has been forgotten."
I personally find this to be very clever and valuable. Taking a look in today's fashion, I truly understand what she meant by that, for the creation of new trends rests on past fashion. Fashion that we have forgotten or not, revived with new additions to it. And with that, fashion is a cycle.


Christian Lacroix
1995
Inspired by 18th Century
Marie Antoinette's gowns




For further reads on the fashionable times of Marie Antoinette and Rose Bertin, below are recommended books that details on the dressings in the French Court.



Silence is better


Silence can mean two things. It could either be that of power or suspicion. I prefer looking at it as power. Saying less gives a greater appearance and makes us more powerful than we are. It makes people uncomfortable but at the same time, it serves us respect.
History teaches us more than anything. With that in mind, let us delve into the past, summoning two historiacal examples as prove to my opinionated point.

King Louis XIV 


Louis XIV, the man of few words, was a highly respected King. In his court, issues of the Kingdom would be discussed by courtiers and ministers, and after those heated debates, representatives would approach the King. From there, they would introduce the issue at hand, followed by detailings of available solutions to the problem.
Louis would listen til the end of the presentation only uttering eloquently, "I shall see" when asked for his opinion. With that, the topic would not be discussed until weeks later where he would have came to his decision and act upon it.

Court of King Louis XIV

From this, we could grasp the fact on how taciturn he was, which was a matter of power. No one was able to predict him, understand him, and more importantly, deceive him. On the contrary, Louis was able to what others can't. As his courtiers tries pleasing him, they unnoticeably revealed more about themselves as they talked on and on to the silent Louis. With all this informations, he was able to differentiate loyalty from potential enemies. And whats more, he could use all those revealed informations against them. Louis XIV was such a powerful King who intimidates his people through silence, which brings them under his fingertips. 
Respect and power was what he had gained from all his silence, and this was not just because he was King.
This is especially why he is of such awe to me.

Kondraty Ryleyev

In the opposite of silence, comes fools who risk themselves through the utterance of redundance.
Kondraty Ryleyev, one of the leaders of a rebellion that happened after Nicholas I in 1825, was sentenced to death.
On the day of his execution, standing on the gallows with a noose around his neck, the trap door opened. Instead of dangling in the air, he found himself on the ground, for the rope had broke. This was considered a sign of heavenly will in those time and such things in that way was pardoned.
As Ryleyev found himself on his feet, he shouted to the crowd " You see, in Russia they don't know how to do anything properly, not even how to make rope!"
With the news of Ryleyev's survival, Nicholas I disappointed, began to sign the pardon letter. But upon hearing of what Ryleyev had shouted on account with his survival, the Czar tore the pardon and said " In that case, let us prove the contrary". The next day, Rylyev was hanged again and the rope did its job.

Rebellion lead by Ryleyev

If he did not say such things, he would have remained alive! Being sacarstic might have given him his satisfaction but in the end, he had to pay with his dear life for that. This is exactly why we should always be careful with our words and learn how to keep them controlled. The best thing would be to keep quiet.

Sure, silence may not always be golden for it do get people in trouble too. But that is a topic for another post.
I've always valued silence be it in myself, or others. But what I really want to say is that we should talk when it is only necessary. Otherwise, it's always best to keep our mouth locked. Afterall, words could literally be the death of us. 








Reference
Greene, R & Elffers, J. (2000). The 48 Laws of Power. New York: Penguin Books.

Vampire Alike


Shrouded in mystery, a ghastly pale face, with protruding razor fangs made his way to me. Eyes ablazed and sinister, it stared straight into my soul..and all I could do was stare back..knowing that it would be the last thing I'd see before my time comes to an end..

Dramatic as it is, it should do well as as an opening introduction to my very subject of Vampires.
But what exactly is a vampire? Are they real? Do they really feed on blood?
I won't be expanding on what a vampire is and such. That is not my motive for this post. 
What I am going to be introducing..is far more sinister than that of a Vampire..in fact, this two particular historical figures could almost be said to be a Vampire.

                  Potrait of Vlad III Dracul

Vlad III Dracul, was a Prince of Wallachia from 1431 to 1476/77, known for his fugarative thirst for blood.
As his nickname "Vlad the Impaler" suggest, he had such a penchant for torturing his victims and enemies through the method of Impalement. 
How exactly was that done? Well, he first pierced his enemies through the torso or the anus, with large stakes planted to the ground, followed by the mouth of the victim. It would be thousands or hundreds impaled at once, and the worst thing? The victims don't die immediately. In fact, it takes few hours for them to die, meaning that they had to go through agonizing pain. The combined death by his impalements were approximate of 100,000! Just imagine that! And most of this were especially for his sadistic pleasings!
Some even said he dined while watching his victims suffer..and others ventured to say that he dipped his bread in their blood!
I guess this was why Bram Stoker had him as a huge inspiration in the thrilling novel of Dracula, who was a vampire. All this, makes me wonder if he was actually a vampire..

       Dinning with entertainments of sufferings.

Countess Erzsebet Bathory

Exactly next to the whereabouts of Vlad in Romania, is Hungary. That was where a certain notorious Countess had lived in. She is the very horrible, Countess Erzsebet Bathory (1560-1614) who was from the known Bathory family of nobility in the kingdom of Hungary.
Sadistic as Vlad, she had tortured and killed many especially young girls for her own pleasures. It began with her girl servants, where she beat them to death or even dragged them out in the winter, naked, and threw icy cold water on them, freezing them to death.
The interesting part is yet to come. She had bathed in her female victim's blood. Why? From what she had discovered, it had appearsd to her that the blood reduced signs of ageing. There were even stories of her drinking the blood.
As the number of deaths of girls made up to around 650, the Kingdom had grown worried and afraid, at last making a decision to put her in trial for her crimes. In the end, she was executed. 
It is such a pity that they did not have anti-ageing creams back then. At least, it could have saved her the many troubles. 
Though Vampire or not, she very much does resembles one.

Now that I come to think about it, I guess maybe Vampires aren't as bad compared to 
those two examples I've given. Sure, Vampires supposedly feed on blood and so on but the thing is..they could be real or fake. However, those two examples I've given had been alive once, and did those unspeakable horrid tortures. But then again, if one were to ask of a living proof, why not we take a look at this very generation, where destructions by weaponries as bombs and deaths of innocents by those causes are endless. 
It is said that Vampires have no heart. But I think, Humans are the one who has no heart. So Vampire alike? I guess not. Humans are worse.

Bombings in Gaza.

                                  End.



*images taken from Google.

Medieval Witch Hunt




              If I were to brainstorm on the term Medieval, I would definitely link it to the notorious witch hunt of the said era. This period of witch hunts and trials were a widespread moral panic suggesting that malevolent Satanic witches were a huge threat to Christianity, reaching its peak around mid-1400s to 1600s, and declining in early 18th century.







            Various executions of witches began long back, even before the Medieval era. Though it was known that on December 5, 1484, Pope Innocent VIII (unlike his name)- who had been a full supporter of torture in the Medieval period-, issued a papal bull where he recognized the existence of witches and gave full papal approval for the Inquisition to hunt these witches as well as giving permission to torture and execute them, as long as they were ridded of.

With this stated, it was basically the Church who gave full consent of this horrid witch massacre without even thinking twice!




             But...how exactly did they know who was a witch?

Apparently,they had various methods and tests during the hunts and trials that would supposedly confirm if they were guilty as a witch or not. Personally, I think they had absurd tests as the Swimming Test or even the Witches Cake method.
One famous test was through the " Witches Marks". This was where suspects were being stripped and publicly examined for signs of unsightly blemishes, moles etc. that witches were claimed to receive upon making their pact with Satan. I personally find this test to be ridiculous! Afterall, it is very common for people to have moles and such.
Another such method was the "Pricking and Scratching" test whereby it had been noted in witch hunting books that the "witches mark" were insensitive to pain and couldn't bleed. With that, examiners used specially designed needles to repeatedly stab and prick the accused witch's flesh til they had the desired result! 
Naturally, there were many con-mens who usually used dulled needle points to identify fake witch's marks. With this, they were very well-paid.




Following up with the victims, it was estimated that a total of 400,000 to 600,000 accused witches were executed, which is insanely a lot!
It had seemed that most women were targeted as suspects. The Inquisitors who had wrote the Malleus Maleficarum had explained that women were most likely to be witches than men as females are more 'concerned with thingsof the flesh' than men, and that females are "imperfect animals" (if any of these actually makes sense!). With that, around 80 to 90% of executed witches were women.
Additionally, it had appeared that females who stood out to speak their opinions were singled as witches ,though I am very unsure of why!
Other than that, old, wise healing women were particularly targeted by witch-hunters.
"At this day", wrote Reginald Scot in 1584, "It is indifferent to say in the English tongue, 'she is a witch', or 'she is a wise woman'".
This accusation was also done as common people of the Medieval era, relied heavily upon these wise women for healings and treatments rather than monks or churchmans as they had a wide understanding of herbs and they don't usually charge for treatments.
I guess this was where the general witches got their image of old womens from.



Delving into the subject of torture and executions, it is important to note that torture was already holding a place in the Medieval culture, so there were many torture devices and methods. But with the rise of witch huntings, they designed and made more torture devices meant specially for the witches.
One prime example was the "Spanish Spider"
It was designed to mutiliate a women's breasts. The Spider was usually chained to the wall - the claws were normally heated before being fixed to the women's chest. The stomach-turning part is where the torturer pulls the women away from the wall. Well, you can guess what happens!
Another one is the horrifying tongue tearer. As the name suggests, it was of an oversized pair of shears, used to cut the tongue. The victim's mouth would be forced open and somehow, the torturer would pull the tongue out and cut it.
As much as these torture methods are 'interesting', it was more often for the witches to be burned at the stake. This was often in hundreds at one go.
How inhumane they could possibly get!




To end off, I would insert my opinion on all of this. As much as I am fascinated and intrigued by the Medieval period, I definitely do not support the witch hunts. Many innocent people and children had died due to the mindless and insensible mentality of the Inquisitions and the higher authorities.
It is a relief that the rulings had changed and in 1682, the last accused witch of England was executed.
As time goes by, the mindset of society becomes more sensible and realistic. Witches are looked to as mere story characters and imaginative made-ups.
All supposed existence of witches in the Medieval era and previous times are put aside as historical myths.
But still..it doesn't mean that witches don't actually exists..


~The End~

For further readings, the books below are much recommended for their depth of the horrific knowledge and portrayal the Medieval witch hunt was. From graphic novel to a non-fiction history book, they present a wider spread of information for those who wishes to learn more.